New Federal Bill: The Child and Family Services Extension and Enhancement Act
Do you believe that child welfare services need to be extended? …or enhanced?
If not, you might want to take action now so that your legislators are aware that you’re not in support of this bill: HR 2790 – which was introduced on August 2, 2011.
Leonard Henderson has been writing about it over at AFRA: Tell your US representative NO!
Given the ineffectiveness of the child welfare agencies, the extreme hardships and cruelties inflicted on families in the name of child “protection”, the evidence that thousands of children are abused or even killed in foster care, the disgusting over-medication of foster children so that the systemites can make more money on them, and the severe budget crisis our country is going through … I will have to agree with Leonard!
Here’s the text of the bill as it reads as of August 11, 2011. The bill text may morph over time as the legislature discusses it and makes changes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
- This Act may be cited as the `Child and Family Services Extension and Enhancement Act’.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF STEPHANIE TUBBS JONES CHILD WELFARE SERVICES PROGRAM.
- (a) In General- Section 425 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 625) is amended by striking `2007 through 2011′ and inserting `2012 through 2016′.
- (b) Modification of Certain State Plan Requirements-
- (1) RESPONSE TO EMOTIONAL TRAUMA- Section 422(b)(15)(A)(ii) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 622(b)(15)(A)(ii)) is amended by inserting `, including emotional trauma associated with a child’s maltreatment and removal from home’ before the semicolon.
- (2) PROCEDURES ON THE USE OF PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATIONS- Section 422(b)(15)(A)(v) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 622(b)(15)(A)(v)) is amended by inserting `, including protocols for the appropriate use and monitoring of psychotropic medications’ before the semicolon.
- (3) DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES TO ADDRESS DEVELOPMENTAL NEEDS OF VERY YOUNG CHILDREN- Section 422(b) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 622(b)) is amended–
- (A) by striking `and’ at the end of paragraph (16);
- (B) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (17) and inserting `; and’; and
- (C) by adding at the end the following:
- `(18) include a description of the activities that the State has undertaken to reduce the length of time children who have not attained 5 years of age are without a permanent family placement, and the activities the State undertakes to address the developmental needs of such children who receive benefits or services under this part or part E.’.
- (c) Child Visitation by Caseworkers- Section 424 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 624) is amended by striking the 2nd subsection (e), as added by section 7(b) of the Child and Family Services Improvement Act of 2006, and inserting the following:
- `(f)(1)(A) Each State shall take such steps as are necessary to ensure that the total number of visits made by caseworkers on a monthly basis to children in foster care under the responsibility of the State during a fiscal year is not less than 90 percent of the total number of such visits that would occur during the fiscal year if each such child were so visited once every month while in such care.
- `(B) If the Secretary determines that a State has failed to comply with subparagraph (A) for a fiscal year, then the percentage that would otherwise apply for purposes of subsection (a) for the fiscal year shall be reduced by–
- `(i) 1, if the number of full percentage points by which the State fell short of the percentage specified in subparagraph (A) is less than 10;
- `(ii) 3, if the number of full percentage points by which the State fell short, as described in clause (i), is not less than 10 and less than 20; or
- `(iii) 5, if the number of full percentage points by which the State fell short, as described in clause (i), is not less than 20.
- `(2)(A) Each State shall take such steps as are necessary to ensure that not less than 50 percent of the total number of visits made by caseworkers to children in foster care under the responsibility of the State during a fiscal year occur in the residence of the child involved.
- `(B) If the Secretary determines that a State has failed to comply with subparagraph (A) for a fiscal year, then the percentage that would otherwise apply for purposes of subsection (a) for the fiscal year shall be reduced by–
- `(i) 1, if the number of full percentage points by which the State fell short of the percentage specified in subparagraph (A) is less than 10;
- `(ii) 3, if the number of full percentage points by which the State fell short, as described in clause (i), is not less than 10 and less than 20; or
- `(iii) 5, if the number of full percentage points by which the State fell short, as described in clause (i), is not less than 20.’.
- (d) Technical Correction- Section 423(b) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 623(b)) is amended by striking `per centum’ each place it appears and inserting `percent’.
SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM TO PROMOTE SAFE AND STABLE FAMILIES.
- (a) In General- Section 436 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 629f) is amended–
- (1) in subsection (a), by striking all that follows `$345,000,000′ and inserting `for each of fiscal years 2012 through 2016.’; and
- (2) in subsection (b)–
- (A) in paragraph (2), by striking `$30,000,000′ and inserting `$20,000,000′;
- (B) in paragraph (4)(A), by striking `433(e)’ and all that follows and inserting `433(e) $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2012 through 2016.’; and
- (C) in paragraph (5), by striking `437(f)’ and all that follows and inserting `437(f) $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2012 through 2016′.
- (b) Discretionary and Targeted Grants- Section 437 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 629g) is amended in each of subsections (a) and (f)(3)(A) by striking `2007 through 2011′ and inserting `2012 through 2016′.
- (c) Entitlement Funding for State Courts To Assess and Improve Handling of Proceedings Relating to Foster Care and Adoption- Section 438 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 629h) is amended–
- (1) in subsection (a)(2)(A), by inserting `, including the requirements in the Act related to concurrent planning and the ability to bypass reunification efforts in certain egregious situations’ before the semicolon;
- (2) in each of subsections (c)(1)(A) and (d), by striking `2002 through 2011′ and inserting `2012 through 2016′;
- (3) in subsection (c)(2)(A)–
- (A) by striking `2006 through 2011′ and inserting `2012 through 2016′; and
- (B) by striking `the amount made available under whichever of paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (e) applies with respect to the grant’ and inserting `the amount reserved pursuant to section 436(b)(2) (and the amount, if any, reserved pursuant to section 437(b)(2))’;
- (4) in subsection (c)(2)(B), by striking `the amount made available under subsection (e) for such a grant’ and inserting `the amount reserved pursuant to section 436(b)(2) (and the amount, if any, reserved pursuant to section 437(b)(2))’; and
- (5) by striking subsection (e).
- (d) Submission to Congress of State Summaries of Financial Data; Publication on Hhs Web Site- Section 432(c) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 629b(c)) is amended–
- (1) by striking all that precedes `shall’ and inserting the following:
- `(c) Annual Submission of State Reports to Congress-
- `(1) IN GENERAL- The Secretary’; and
- (2) by adding after and below the end the following:
- `(2) INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED- The compilation shall include the individual State reports and tables that synthesize State information into national totals for each element required to be included in the reports, including planned and actual spending by service category for the program authorized under this subpart and planned spending by service category for the program authorized under subpart 1.
- `(3) PUBLIC ACCESSIBILITY- Not later than September 30 of each year, the Secretary shall publish the compilation on the Web site of the Department of Health and Human Services in a location easily accessible by the public.’.
- (e) Elimination of References to Methamphetamines in Substance Abuse Grants- Section 437(f) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 629g(f)) is amended–
- (1) in the subsection heading, by striking `Methamphetamine or Other’;
- (2) in each of paragraphs (1), (4)(A), (7)(A)(i), and (9)(B)(iii), by striking `methamphetamine or other’; and
- (3) in paragraph (7)–
- (A) by striking `shall–’ and all that follows through `(A) take’ and inserting `shall take’;
- (B) in subparagraph (A)(iv), by striking `; and’ and inserting a period;
- (C) by striking subparagraph (B); and
- (D) by redesignating clauses (i) through (iv) of subparagraph (A) as subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively, and moving each of such provisions 2 ems to the left.
- (f) Grants for Programs for Mentoring Children of Prisoners- Section 439 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 629i) is amended–
- (1) by striking subsection (a)(2) and inserting the following:
- `(2) PURPOSE- The purpose of this section is to authorize the Secretary to make competitive grants to applicants in areas with substantial numbers of children of incarcerated parents, in order to support the establishment or expansion and operation of programs using a network of public and private community entities to provide mentoring services for children of prisoners.’;
- (2) in subsection (c)–
- (A) by striking `(i) for a fiscal year that remain after applying subsection (i)(2)’ and inserting `(h) for a fiscal year that remain after applying subsection (h)(2)’; and
- (B) by striking `2007 through 2011′ and inserting `2012 through 2016′;
- (3) by striking subsection (g);
- (4) in subsection (h)–
- (A) in paragraph (1), by striking `, including the service delivery demonstration project authorized under subsection (g)’; and
- (B) in paragraph (2)–
- (i) by striking subparagraph (B);
- (ii) in subparagraph (C), by striking `and how the evaluation has been expanded to include an evaluation of the demonstration project authorized under subsection (g)’; and
- (iii) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) and (D) as subparagraphs (B) and (C), respectively;
- (5) in subsection (i)–
- (A) in paragraph (1), by striking `such sums as may be necessary for fiscal years 2007 through 2011′ and inserting `$25,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2012 through 2016′; and
- (B) in paragraph (2)–
- (i) by striking all through `The Secretary’ and inserting the following:
- `(2) RESERVATION FOR RESEARCH, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, AND EVALUATION- The Secretary’; and
- (ii) by striking subparagraph (B); and
- (6) by redesignating subsections (h) and (i) as subsections (g) and (h), respectively.
- (g) Technical Corrections-
- (1) Section 432(a)(8)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 629b(a)(8)(B)) is amended in each of clauses (i) and (ii) by striking `forms CFS 101-Part I and CFS 101-Part II (or any successor forms)’ and inserting `form CFS-101 (including all parts and any successor forms)’.
- (2) Section 433(c)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 629c(c)(2)) is amended by striking `benefits benefits’ each place it appears and inserting `benefits’.
- (3) Effective as if included in the enactment of the Safe and Timely Interstate Placement of Foster Children Act of 2006, section 8(b) of such Act (120 Stat. 513) is amended by striking `438(b) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 638(b))’ inserting `438(b)(1) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 629h(b)(1))’.
SEC. 4. DATA STANDARDIZATION FOR IMPROVED DATA MATCHING.
- (a) In General- Part B of title IV of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 621-629i) is amended by adding at the end the following:
`Subpart 3–Common Provisions
`SEC. 440. DATA STANDARDIZATION FOR IMPROVED DATA MATCHING.
- `(a) Standard Data Elements-
- `(1) DESIGNATION- The Secretary, in consultation with an interagency work group established by the Office of Management and Budget, and considering State perspectives, shall, by rule, designate standard data elements for any category of information required to be reported under this part.
- `(2) DATA ELEMENTS MUST BE NONPROPRIETARY AND INTEROPERABLE- The standard data elements designated under paragraph (1) shall, to the extent practicable, be nonproprietary and interoperable.
- `(3) OTHER REQUIREMENTS- In designating standard data elements under this subsection, the Secretary shall, to the extent practicable, incorporate–
- `(A) interoperable standards developed and maintained by an international voluntary consensus standards body, as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, such as the International Organization for Standardization;
- `(B) interoperable standards developed and maintained by intergovernmental partnerships, such as the National Information Exchange Model; and
- `(C) interoperable standards developed and maintained by Federal entities with authority over contracting and financial assistance, such as the Federal Acquisition Regulations Council.
- `(b) Data Standards for Reporting-
- `(1) DESIGNATION- The Secretary, in consultation with an interagency work group established by the Office of Management and Budget, and considering State government perspectives, shall, by rule, designate data reporting standards to govern the reporting required under this part.
- `(2) REQUIREMENTS- The data reporting standards required by paragraph (1) shall, to the extent practicable–
- `(A) incorporate a widely accepted, non-proprietary, searchable, computer-readable format;
- `(B) be consistent with and implement applicable accounting principles; and
- `(C) be capable of being continually upgraded as necessary.
- `(3) INCORPORATION OF NONPROPRIETARY STANDARDS- In designating reporting standards under this subsection, the Secretary shall, to the extent practicable, incorporate existing nonproprietary standards, such as the eXtensible Business Reporting Language.’.
- (b) Effective Date- The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on October 1, 2012, and shall apply with respect to information required to be reported on or after such date.
SEC. 5. PROVISIONS RELATING TO FOSTER CARE OR ADOPTION.
- (a) Educational Stability for Each Foster Placement- Section 475(1)(G) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 675(1)(G)) is amended–
- (1) in clause (i), by striking `the placement’ and inserting `each placement’; and
- (2) in clause (ii)(I), by inserting `each’ before `placement’.
- (b) Study on Recruitment of and Support for Foster Parents, Adoptive Parents, and Kin Guardians-
- (1) IN GENERAL- The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall, in accordance with paragraph (2), conduct a study on the recruitment of and support for families caring for children served by any program funded under part E of title IV of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 670 et seq.), including foster parents, adoptive parents, and kin guardians.
- (2) CONTENTS OF STUDY- The study shall include–
- (A) a survey of foster parents, who care for children served by any foster care program funded under part E of title IV of the Social Security Act;
- (B) an evaluation of the role of respite care training and services;
- (C) the identification of the capacity of respite care service providers in each State;
- (D) the identification of any barriers that limit the ability of States to successfully recruit and retain foster families in the foster care system;
- (E) the identification of any barriers that limit the ability of States to successfully recruit and support adoptive parents and relative caregivers; and
- (F) any other matters that the Secretary of Health and Human Services deems appropriate for this study.
- (3) REPORT- Within 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall submit to Congress a report containing the findings of the study required by paragraph (1), and such recommendations with respect to the matters studied as the Secretary deems appropriate.
- (c) Description of Adoption Spending- Section 473(a)(8) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 673(a)(8)) is amended by inserting `, and shall document how such amounts are spent, including on post-adoption services’ before the period.
SEC. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE.
- (a) In General- Except as otherwise provided in this Act, this Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on October 1, 2011, and shall apply to payments under parts B and E of title IV of the Social Security Act for calendar quarters beginning on or after such date, without regard to whether regulations to implement the amendments are promulgated by such date.
- (b) Delay Permitted if State Legislation Required- If the Secretary of Health and Human Services determines that State legislation (other than legislation appropriating funds) is required in order for a State plan developed pursuant to subpart 1 of part B, or a State plan approved under subpart 2 of part B or part E, of title IV of the Social Security Act to meet the additional requirements imposed by the amendments made by this Act, the plan shall not be regarded as failing to meet any of the additional requirements before the 1st day of the 1st calendar quarter beginning after the first regular session of the State legislature that begins after the date of the enactment of this Act. If the State has a 2-year legislative session, each year of the session is deemed to be a separate regular session of the State legislature.
Similar Posts:
- New Federal Bill: The Child and Family Services Extension and Enhancement Act
- The Mother’s Act
- CPS Should Be Audited In Every State – And You Can Help Get This Started
- Texas: Foster “Parent” Convicted In Death Of 3-Year-Old Foster Child
- North Carolina Child Collecting Foster-Adoptive Parent To Go On Trial for Murder of Four-Year-Old Child
Print This Post
Email This Post
Comments (25)
IT IS ABOUT TIME WE HAVE SOMEONE TO LOOK IN TO CHANGING CPS AND HOW THEY HANDLE OUR KIDS.
Comment by penny w — August 12, 2011 @ 4:21 am
After reading the bill completely, what I get from this is they are reducing funding from 345 million down to 80 million over 4 years. Extending only one year, and basically making sure that anything done by CPS is recorded on computer. Sounds like a lot of lay offs and children who really need financial support will not be getting it. Foster care will be non existant because there will no longer be funding for it and many more children will be left in homes where abuse. takes place. with all the huge cutbacks, funding only 20 million a year nation wide, the result will be less intrusion by CPS in our homes.Sounds good to me for parents who are not guilty but bad for kids in a serious abusive situation. Maybe CPS will be forced to handle only severe cases? But in the end, its the child that will lose the financial benefits and any hope of security.
Comment by Michael — August 12, 2011 @ 7:52 am
correction, extending 5 years. Allowing visits from social workers 90% of current bill. Less funding $345 million down to $100 million over 5 years equals less service, less involvement. Sounds like lay offs of 66% of staff and they have been laying off for the last 3 years already. Many offices will have to be closed. In any case, it looks like a step in the right direction. Shrinking CPS means less CPS involvement in family business.The bill needs the right changes to daily operations, but this is not addressed here. Sad.
Comment by Michael — August 12, 2011 @ 8:00 am
Here’s my observations about HR 2790-
The concept of renewing this Frankensteins Monster hopefully will be diminished because it is being sponsored by a REPUBLICAN.
Which is an “out of body” experience for me because CPS is unabashed communism- the Dimocrat’s forte.
Wouldn’t it be WONDERFUL if the Dimocrats opposed HR 2790 right up party lines?
Howl it from the rooftops. Leave it in comments everywhere- NO on HR 2790.
http://familyrights.us/activism/hr_2790.html
Leonard Henderson, co-founder
American Family Rights
http://familyrights.us
“Until Every Child Comes Home”©
“The Voice of America’s Families”©
Comment by Leonard Henderson — August 12, 2011 @ 9:56 am
Hopefully this is a step in the right direction. Maybe this will start to derail this incredibly abusive monster. It may save innocent children from abuse.
Comment by John — August 14, 2011 @ 4:23 am
Well,
I just found out that DHR had my step son labeled as mentally retarded and now he does not have to try at school at all. The foster parent they put him with did not want all that work! He is ADHD not mentally retarded. He is a smart kid.
Comment by Jack — August 14, 2011 @ 5:17 am
I am a mother who has lost two children to the system and a third on ho has been locked up, and now in a group home promised by social services if i moved backed to colorado that it would be easier for my son to return home to me. But since this is the state that they took to other children from me termination on they knew that they would’nt give him back to me. Because than they would of had to admit they where wrong for taking the other two. I hope that there is something I can do to help someone else not go threw the pain of loss of a childs love from there real mother.
Comment by katlynn — August 14, 2011 @ 10:41 am
It is past time to reform CPS. They have way too much authority over our familys.It is a corrupt organization !
Comment by Bennie Jane — August 14, 2011 @ 10:55 am
You can be sure that cutbacks will affect the true hard cases. They are the ones that take so much time and effort to deal with. Snatching innocent people’s children is much easier and more efficient in growing the CPS growth industry.
Social workers have little incentive to work hard and have little results to show. They have a lot of incentive to show volume results and appear productive.
It is only the personal moral restraints of many of the individual social workers that restrains the CPS child-gobbling monster from being far worse.
Comment by Al — August 16, 2011 @ 12:46 pm
Please go to this site and sign the petition.Department of children and families abuse of power.
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/florida-department-of-child-and-families-dcf-power-abuse/
“The world is a dangerous place to live, not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don’t do anything about it”. -Albert Einstein
Thank You
Randy
Comment by Randy — August 19, 2011 @ 5:00 am
Good day to everyone, I want to see CPS/DHS get HOME PARENT MEETING, CASE PLANS AND CLASSES TAKEN HISTORY INVESTIGATED records PULL, BEFORE A CHILD IS EVER REMOVED FROM THEIR HOME (I WENT THRU THIS IN 2006 and won) how or why this happen? BUT In 2008, at a local shelter here in Newberg. A MOTHER, of Kyle who is 4 the dad a jack of all trades, But I need to say first of all, the good and bad of every family, they are alcoholics which alot of American are. 9 months I never saw a threat or verbal disagreement, or any behavior but an Agency especially the resident manager work with the couple to ween them of the “drink”, husband GOT shakes from a withdrawl, night terror dreams of his childhood his family denies, no justice, no punishment but hold office in this Quaker Town. This couple goes beyond to help and his wife is strong minded, a will of a survivor a teacher of imagination and the energy of a creative mind if not in the kitchen it out side showing her 4 year old son how a seed grows, and the end of the day always asks, Is there anything else I can help you… So in Alcohol class (a call from doctors office) no history no reports no signs etc, Child Protection removes a obviously loved nurtured and smiles like the son confident and excited that a new day has begun, a child that sparkled and bounced with joy. DHS wouldn’t end their current class of 14/mo, a CPS/DHS of Mcminnville reports failure, case plan different programs DONE, but DHS refused to start class/begin a next requirement and failed them, no son, no home SEC 8 no contact to grieve with eachother because no one knows them judge had the power did nothing why??
Comment by traci for brandie&kevin — August 23, 2011 @ 7:32 am
To Whom it my Concerned, My name is: Flordeliza Arrojo Ayson Viloria, I am a mother of FOUR childrens. Since 2001, Till now.
Not, Only a MOTHER also a FATHER, COLLAGE STUDENT & SMALL BUSINESS OWNER.
I was one of the SEATTLE TACOMA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SECURITY the VERY FIRST DAY OF 9/11 2001 TERRORISYM EMERGENCY.
I got (LAID OFF) (TSA) took over my JOB possition at the Airport Security.
My (FOUR CHILDRENS) are (KIDNAPPED) INSIDE the (MUKILTEO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 6:/ SNOHOMSH COUNTY/ School CPS/DSHS/MUKILTEO POLICE DEPARTMENT (with out) any DEPENDENCY COURT JUDGE order In (2004).
After my FOUR childrens are “KIDNAPPED” by CAPTA FAMILY ORGANIZATIONS OF STATE & FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. My four childrens are “MISSING” for FEW weeks in 2004. On MARCH 30th, 2004 at 12:00 noon, I SAW my TWO sons in the NEWS ( DEAD) this is how, I FOUND my TWO younger sons. In the NEWS DEAD. UNTIL NOW, Iam STILL being HURRASH, By: CAPTA FAMILY ORGANIZATIONS OF STATE & FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. WHY? DO I HAVE TO PAY FOR ALL OF YOUR (CAPTA FAMILY ORGANIZATION AGENCY EMPLOYEES? MISTAKES FOR?
I was only a FORMER AIRPORT SECURITY THE VERY FIRST DAY OF 9/11/2001 TERRORISYM EMERGENCY, Got LAID OFF, And WAS OFFERED TWO YEARS to go BACK to COLLAGEby your OWENED FEDERAL GOVERNMENT?. My FOUR childrens are KIDNAPPED and MISSING for FEW weeks, Before the FATAL ACCIDENT and ALL OF the FALSE ACCUSATIONS AGAINST ME.
Your: CAPTA FAMILY ORGANIZATION OF STATE & FEDERAL AND AGEGENCIES FAULTS, WHY my son name: DANIEL AYSON VILORIA (DIED) He was SEVEN YEARS OLD.
CAPTA FAMILY ORGANIZATIONS OF STATE, FEDERAL & GOVERNMENT AGENCIES & FAMILY & CHILDRENS ADMINISTRATIONS & JUVINILE COURTS & SCHOOL ATTENDANTS COUNCELORS, Should be TERMINATED and CLOSE DOWN PERMANENTLY.
I Flordeliza Arrojo Ayson /Viloria (VICTIM) of: (CAPTA FAMILY ORGANIZATION OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY OF FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES. 08/23th/2011/Tuesday.
Comment by Flordeliza Arrojo Ayson Viloria — August 23, 2011 @ 8:32 am
H.R. 2790 SOULD BE CLOSED DOWN & TERMINATED (SAME) with DENY YOUTH CENTER OF FAMILY JUVINILE COURTS/SCHOOL ATTENDANT BECKA. CAPTA FAMILY ORGANIZATIONS OF STATE, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES.
All of this CHILDRENS AND FAMILY PROGRAMS, Are (NOT) really HELPING OUT NEEDY FAMILIES. It is COUSING more KIDDNAPPINGS/ TREATS / DEATHS/ To ALL of the the INNOCENT PARENTS, CHILDRENS / ETC., CHILD SUPPORT EMFORCEMENT AGENCIES ALSO (NEED) TO BE TERMINATED. ALL OF .YOU EMPLOYEES OF: CAPTA FAMILY ORGANIZATIONS OF THE STATES / FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES & INVESTORS OF ALL OF THE CHILDRENS AND FAMILY ORGANIZATIONS are WHOLE BUNCH of CRIMINALS.
SOME BODY HAS TO (STOP) ALL OF YOU, FOR ALL OF YOUR WRONGFULL OF DOING, TO MAKE (BLODDY MONEY) To (BRING) HOME to your FAMILIES, To SUPPORT and USED THE BLODDY MONEY, To SUPPORT and to FEED YOUR CHILDRENS and FAMILY.
I only (BELIEVE) in BAD CARMA.
Untill NOW, Iam STILL TRAUMATIZE & LIVING in so much PAIN.
ALL OF MY FOUR CHILDRENS ARE: (SAFE, ALIVE) when, ALL of my FOUR childrens are WITH ME. Not! “UNTIL” (CAPTA FAMILY ORGANIZATIONS OF STATE / FEDERAL AND GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, CHILDRENS AND FAMILY ORGANIZATIONS. Came IN into my (PRIVATE LIFE and INVADE my PRIVATE, SAFETY LIFE with my FOUR CHILDRENS & GRAND DAUGHTER. BEFORE, the FATAL ACCIDENT. On MARCH 30th, 2004 FATAL ACCIDENT AND OTHER FALSE ACCUSATIONS All Of You haveREPORTED AGAINST ME.
In The Name Of: LORD JESUS CRIST AMEN.
Flordeliza Arrojo Ayson Viloria (Mother & Victim Of: CHILDRENS KIDNAPPING INSIDE THE SCHOOL PROPERTY BY CPS DSHS & POLICE DEPARTMENTS FALSE ACCUSATIONS) OF: HARBOUR POINT BLVD. MUKILTEO, WASHINGTON 98275. BEFORE, FATAL ACCIDENT on MARCH 30th, 2004.
IN MEMORY OF ALL OF THE CHILDRENS AND MY CHILDRENS THAT SUFFERED, BY THE WRONGFULL OF DOING AND CRIMINAL ACTIVIST OF ALL OF THE: CAPTA FAMILY ORGANIZATIONS OF STATES AND FEDERAL GAVERNMENT AGENCIES/ CHILDRENS AND FAMILY ORGANIZATIONS / CHURCHES/SCHOOLS/LAWYERS/JUDGES AND TO ALL OF THE COMPANIES AND EVERY ONE HUMAN BEING THAT, INVESTED THEIR MONEY. IN CHILDRENS AND FAMILIES.
May the LIGHT AND THE GLORY THE GOD LORD JESUS CRIST THE HIGHEST, WILL COME, TO ALL OF THE VICTIMS LIKE, TO SHINE OUR NEEDY TO HELP US VICTIMS OF:
CAPTA FAMILY ORGANIZATIONS OF STATES AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES OF CHILDRENS OF FAMILY ORGANIZATIONS.
I LIKE TO GIVE MY BLESSING TO ALL OF THE VICTIMS THAT (DIED) CHILDRENS & PARENTS (REST IN PEACE.
IN THE NAME OF: OUR FATHER THE SON OF THE HOLY SPIRITS AMEN.
By.
Flordeliza Arrojo Ayson / Viloria
Business Name:
FAA GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LABOR AGENCY SERVICES (D.B.A.)
FAA JANITORIAL AGENCY SERVICES
FAA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Old Business Name Was: LIZA’S JANITORIAL AGENCY SERVICES
10032 39th Ave. SW
Seattle, Washington 98146
E: faa.janitorialagency@yahoo.com
C: (206) 999 – 9062
Comment by Flordeliza Arrojo Ayson Viloria — August 23, 2011 @ 9:36 am
My Last (Lawyer) told me that, I DO NOT HAVE ANYTHING to “FILE” Against the State or any one.
But! One “Da” I Called the 1 800 number of the: STATE TORT CLAIM Office.
I “FOUND OUT” (THAT) my LAST (LAWYER) in Seattle (Down Town) Office, “WAS” CLAIMING for TEN MILLION dollars AGAINST the STATE GOVERNMENT for DAMAGES. After All Of The Times Lawyer: Mr. MARK L. TOLD me that, I DO NOT HAVE ANY (CLAIMS TO FILE) agains any body.
BeforeL Lawyer: Mr. Mark L., My other Lawyer: Mr. Stephane C., TOOK my CASE, Lawyer: Stephen C., Told me that, I HAVE, FEW CASE AGAINST to FILE. He ASK me, If, he can come over to my HOUSE to HELP him out, with the FILES that WAS in the BOX, From my FIRST LAWYERS FILES in the BIG BOX. Inside my HOME with Lawyer: Mr. Stephen C.He started acting weard. Lawyer: Mr. Stephen C. STARTED TAUCHING me, Lawyer Mr. Stephene C. TOLD me that, If, I DO NOT GIVE to HIM WHAT, HE WANTS TO DO WITH ME, THAT, HE WILL (DROP) ALL OF THE POTENTIAL LAWSUITES. ALL OF THE ABOVE.
I DID NOT GIVE TO Lawyer: Mr. Stephene C. what he wants from me. SO, LAWYER: Mr. STEPHENE C. (DROP) ALL OF THE CASES. AND TOLD ME THAT, I DO NOT HAVE A CASE TO FILE.
I HAVE SO MANY LAWYERS/ ALL OF THEM (LIED) TO ME, ALL OF THEM, NEVER (DID) CORRECTLY & HONEST WAY, TO DO THEIR (JOBS) TO SUPPORT ME, SINCE DAY ONE.
Victim Mother name:
Flordeliza Arrojo Ayson / Viloria
Business Names:
FAA GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LABOR AGENCY SERVICES (D.B.A.)
FAA JANITORIAL AGENCY SERVICES
FAA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES
WAS: LIZA’S JANITORIAL AGENCY SERVICES
10032 39th Ave SW
Seattle, Washington 98146
Email: faa.janitorialagency@yahoo.com
Contact No: (206) 999 – 9062
Comment by Flordeliza Arrojo Ayson Viloria — August 23, 2011 @ 10:12 am
A woman who was in charge of the child advocacy center was arrested for identity theft. She charged up a credit card in an amount in excess of $25,000.00. This was the woman who interviewed my children for more than five hours. She had the children trained to respond with the answers she wanted. Apparently there were other people she did that to. Ying and the yang, what goes around comes around, you reap what you sow, POETIC JUSTICE!
Comment by Poetic Justice — August 31, 2011 @ 2:51 am
My daughter was taken frm me aftr testing positive 4 opiates. i was told i could continue on the pain medication i was on w no potential danger to my unborn baby. apparently this was not the case.. when my daughter was born 3mos ago she was nevr medically cleared to leave the hospital w me. thankfully my cousin steppd up & took her home 11days after she was born. now they only give me 1 hr a week 2 bond w my baby and im so discouraged by the impossible thngs they want me 2 accomplish, i feel like giving up!
Comment by Mommy of 2 angels — September 17, 2011 @ 10:46 pm
Mommy of 2 angels, I’m glad your baby is with a family member. But I’m wondering what they’re asking you to do that you consider impossible. I would expect the service plan to be difficult, but possible. I hope you’ll not give up and that you’ll find some helpful ideas on this site.
Comment by Linda Martin — September 17, 2011 @ 11:18 pm
Thank God that I have my children back and truly writing this brings tears to my eyes to think about the wickedness that surrounds such an organization. The control and manipulation that is used to keep a child from his or her mother or father. I love my children and no one on this site has to lose there children. One thing that I learned from Linda was that appealing to a higher power is truly one of the best ways to have your child returned to you. I prayed day and night. But there was no way on God’s green earth that I was going to have my children taken away from me and they have since been returned to my custody. Thank you God in heaven, I owe all my thanks to you. Thank you Linda for such a great site. Visit my site for advice in getting you children returned to you. God Bless America!
Comment by Monique — September 29, 2011 @ 6:32 am
Great news! Congratulations, Monique, and thanks for helping other parents in need!
Comment by Linda Martin — September 30, 2011 @ 10:17 pm
My other issue w/ cps was even in court we proved their service plan never once included returning my girls home. Nor did cps ever know the true nature of my injuries & why I needed 2B on pain meds yet they were trying to forced me 2 do the impossible & go off them against medical advice which I tried detox 2X & was in so much physical pain from my injuries I just wanted to die. My dr put me back on them 2 months later. CPS told my girls my drugs were more important 2 me than them. Who does that. I couldnt move, funtion or take care of my kids in that condition. Taking them I could. I go thru pain mgt, hv spinal injections thruout my entire spine 2 help the pain & still need meds. A mom who kids r her world & loses them 2 lies, deception, & manipulation & they r made 2 not want anything 2 do w/ her falls down further & further after 3 yrs of fighting & 1 yr of complete loss what more can I do when I cant even reach them. They r my heart & soul my purpose for being. Im so lost now.
Comment by Deborah Smith — October 2, 2011 @ 8:58 am
Ironically it was the place I fell on the ice and hit my head on the concrete giving me 3 herniated discs, debilitating headaches, that called cps on me. Prior to that I was also injured w/ other heniated discs & severe headaches & on pain meds but funtioning very well as room mother, involved in my 10 yr olds softball for 5 yrs & other things. Cps came to my house 4 5 1/2 months w/ never an issue until a day the law gaurdian shows up w/ her when my 14 yr & I happen 2B fighting. That was it. The end. The next day they were stolen from me never to be allowed in my life again. I begged & pleaded w/God. How cud he allow this. I prayed 4 restoration. W/in 6mos the same cps wrkr wanted me 2 sign a tpr telling me she’d make sure I’d never see my kids again. And she did. Even tho I fought for 3 years, w/3 diff. appt. attys none helping me purposely. Ultimately losing those little girls I love so much who r now 14 & 18 r being pushed 4 adoption. These people need 2b held accountable 4 their actions How?
Comment by Deborah Smith — October 2, 2011 @ 9:43 am
Hold these monsters accountable!Sue them!
Comment by melinda — October 13, 2011 @ 1:26 am
PLEASE PLEASE HELP ME..
I HAVE A CURRENT OPEN CPS CASE FROM CALAVERAS CO.,CA.
MY DAUGHTER HAS BEEN IN FOSTER CARE FOR TWO YEARS NOW OVER FALSE ALLEGATIONS.I AM IN DESPARETE NEED OF TRUE LAWYER THAT IS NOT INTIMINDATED BY CALAVERAS CO. IF ANYBODY HAS ANY ADVICE OR IF LAWYER THAT WANTS TO REALLY HELP REUNITE A MOTHER AND DAUGHTER TOGETHER PLEASE LET ME KNOW. THANK YOU.
Comment by heather — December 3, 2011 @ 10:20 pm
i dont agree with who ever started the cps program because they play god
if a child has been sexzally abusied or psychically abusied then they should .but for partents who houses that are no on a white glove treatment
but still enough clean for a child i think they have no means in stepping in.the state of txz need to limted their program only for a child who has been beat or sexually hurt not a child who has been feed or clothed and the partents house in not up to their standers my goodness this is why there are kids killing and stealing because the partents rights have been taken .
Comment by michellie — December 7, 2011 @ 6:17 pm
report them all to the fbi please
Comment by we all hate this people — January 30, 2012 @ 3:54 am